<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Credit Issues in Underinsured Motorist Claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gjel.com/blog/credit-underinsured-motorist-claims.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gjel.com/blog/credit-underinsured-motorist-claims.html</link>
	<description>California's Preeminent Personal Injury and Auto Accident Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.gjel.com/blog/credit-underinsured-motorist-claims.html#comment-77822</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 02:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gjel.com/?p=1168#comment-77822</guid>
		<description>1-- those employees are covered unless there is an exclusion
2-- they just have no coverage
3-- WC carrier lives with the consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1&#8211; those employees are covered unless there is an exclusion<br />
2&#8211; they just have no coverage<br />
3&#8211; WC carrier lives with the consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.gjel.com/blog/credit-underinsured-motorist-claims.html#comment-77820</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 02:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gjel.com/?p=1168#comment-77820</guid>
		<description>See the following case which: &quot;authorizes the insurer to reduce the loss payable to the insured by “the amount paid and the present value of all amounts payable” under workers&#039; compensation law. (§ 11580.2, subd. (h)(l).&quot;  Rangel v. Interinsurance Exchange  4 Cal.4th 1, 8 (Cal. 1992).  So there would be a finding of present value, assuming the policy language permitted such a credit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the following case which: &#8220;authorizes the insurer to reduce the loss payable to the insured by “the amount paid and the present value of all amounts payable” under workers&#8217; compensation law. (§ 11580.2, subd. (h)(l).&#8221;  Rangel v. Interinsurance Exchange  4 Cal.4th 1, 8 (Cal. 1992).  So there would be a finding of present value, assuming the policy language permitted such a credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Corzine</title>
		<link>http://www.gjel.com/blog/credit-underinsured-motorist-claims.html#comment-77799</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Corzine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 02:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gjel.com/?p=1168#comment-77799</guid>
		<description>What happens to the UM credit for Work Comp benefits when the comp case settles giving the injured worker future medical benefits? Is there a credit for the not yet ascertained future medical amounts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens to the UM credit for Work Comp benefits when the comp case settles giving the injured worker future medical benefits? Is there a credit for the not yet ascertained future medical amounts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garland Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.gjel.com/blog/credit-underinsured-motorist-claims.html#comment-3214</link>
		<dc:creator>Garland Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 19:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gjel.com/?p=1168#comment-3214</guid>
		<description>Hypothetical: Employer (Insured) has a fleet of 100 vehicles (CA). Of these, 5 are operated primarily by corp. officers/owners.  Insured elects to insure the 5 vehicles for UM/UIMC, but not the other 95.  Are there any ramifications to the insured:
1. from the employees that may be using the vehicle while &quot;not at work&quot;
2. from the employees while at work, without benefit of the UM/UIMC
3. from the Workers&#039; comp carrier being unable to subrogate the insured&#039;s auto carrier 

I enjoyed the blog. Thanks.
Garland G. (Gar) Wright
Wright Insurance, P. O. Box 40, Lodi, 95241
O-209-334-0870- Fax 209-334-1939
License No. 0258188</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hypothetical: Employer (Insured) has a fleet of 100 vehicles (CA). Of these, 5 are operated primarily by corp. officers/owners.  Insured elects to insure the 5 vehicles for UM/UIMC, but not the other 95.  Are there any ramifications to the insured:<br />
1. from the employees that may be using the vehicle while &#8220;not at work&#8221;<br />
2. from the employees while at work, without benefit of the UM/UIMC<br />
3. from the Workers&#8217; comp carrier being unable to subrogate the insured&#8217;s auto carrier </p>
<p>I enjoyed the blog. Thanks.<br />
Garland G. (Gar) Wright<br />
Wright Insurance, P. O. Box 40, Lodi, 95241<br />
O-209-334-0870- Fax 209-334-1939<br />
License No. 0258188</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

