An 89-year-old Chico resident has died after he was struck by a vehicle while crossing the street against a red traffic signal on Sunday night, according to the Chico Police Department. The fatal pedestrian collision occurred at the intersection of East Avenue and Ceres Avenue, a busy crossing in the heart of Chico, and has left neighbors and family members grappling with a heartbreaking and preventable loss.


Juris digital two vehicles in an intersection at night time d6332e96 7c5b 4ef4 ad96 435f9dea8862

How the Crash Unfolded

Officers with the Chico Police Department responded to the intersection of East Avenue and Ceres Avenue at approximately 9:12 p.m. Sunday after receiving reports of a vehicle versus pedestrian collision. When officers arrived at the scene, they found the 89-year-old man in critical condition. He was transported to a local hospital for treatment, but despite medical efforts, he did not survive his injuries.

The driver of the vehicle, a 72-year-old resident of Oroville, remained at the scene and cooperated fully with investigators throughout the process. Authorities have not released his identity, stating that he was found to bear no fault in the collision. East Avenue and Ceres Avenue sit in a heavily trafficked area of Chico, with the intersection seeing a steady flow of vehicles even in the evening hours.

When patrol units arrived within minutes of the initial 911 calls, they immediately began emergency first aid while awaiting paramedics, working to stabilize the victim before he could be transported. The nighttime timing of the crash, shortly after 9:00 p.m., meant that visibility at the crossing would have been limited to the illumination provided by the intersection’s streetlights and passing headlights.

This factor that often plays a role in pedestrian collisions after dark. Emergency responders closed portions of the intersection for several hours as officers documented the scene, photographed the point of impact, and worked to preserve evidence before reopening the roadway to traffic.

Investigation Points to Pedestrian Crossing Against the Signal

The Chico Police Department’s Major Accident Investigation Team, known as M.A.I.T., took over the investigation into the crash. As part of their work, investigators obtained surveillance footage from a nearby camera that captured the moments leading up to the collision. That footage reportedly showed the victim crossing East Avenue against a red traffic signal and stepping into the path of an oncoming vehicle.

Investigators also determined that the driver was not impaired at the time of the crash and that excessive speed was not a factor. Detectives further learned that the victim had left his nearby home that evening without telling anyone where he was going. He lived in close proximity to the intersection where the crash occurred, a detail that speaks to how quickly a routine walk near home can turn tragic.

Understanding Fault in California Pedestrian Accident Cases

Cases like this one raise difficult but important legal questions. California follows a pure comparative fault system, meaning that even when a pedestrian’s own actions, such as crossing against a signal, contribute to a crash, that does not automatically eliminate the possibility of shared responsibility or a viable claim.

Under California Civil Code Section 1714, every person is responsible for injuries caused by their want of ordinary care, and drivers are still expected to exercise reasonable caution and remain attentive to their surroundings, especially near intersections with foot traffic. When a driver is found to be free of negligence, as investigators have indicated here, a traditional negligence claim against that driver becomes far more limited.

Families in these situations often need experienced legal guidance to fully understand what options, if any, may still be available to them, including potential claims tied to roadway design, signal timing, or other contributing factors that are not always apparent from an initial police investigation.

It is also worth noting that a pedestrian crossing against a signal is not automatically barred from any legal remedy, nor does it necessarily shield every other potentially responsible party from scrutiny.

California’s pure comparative fault framework, as applied in cases such as Li v. Yellow Cab Co., allows responsibility to be divided among multiple parties based on the specific facts of the crash, rather than assigning all blame to a single individual.

Beyond the driver involved, factors such as intersection visibility, signal timing, crosswalk design, and roadway lighting may warrant additional consideration, particularly at intersections with a history of pedestrian incidents.

An experienced attorney can help a family understand whether any such factors played a role, since these details are not always uncovered through a standard police investigation and often require an independent review of the scene and surrounding circumstances.

Wrongful Death Claims Under California Law

When a fatal pedestrian accident occurs, surviving family members may have the right to pursue a wrongful death claim under California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 377.60 and 377.30. These statutes allow a decedent’s spouse, children, or other qualifying heirs to seek compensation for the losses that follow the death of a loved one.

These include funeral and burial expenses, loss of financial support, and loss of companionship and guidance. California generally allows two years from the date of death to file a wrongful death action, though the applicable deadline can shift depending on the specific facts involved, which is why consulting an attorney promptly after a fatal accident is so important.

Beyond the statutory deadlines, California law also allows a decedent’s estate to pursue a related but distinct claim known as a survival action under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 377.30, which covers damages the victim himself could have claimed had he survived, such as pre-death pain and suffering or medical expenses incurred before his passing.

This is separate from the wrongful death claim brought by surviving family members, and in many cases, both types of claims can be pursued together to ensure that the full scope of the family’s losses, both those experienced by the victim and those experienced by the people who loved him, are properly accounted for.

Determining which heirs qualify to bring these claims and how any resulting compensation should be divided among them can become complicated when multiple family members are involved, which is another reason families are encouraged to seek legal guidance soon after a loss like this one.

How Wrongful Death Settlements Are Calculated

Attorneys and insurance adjusters typically rely on one of two methods to help value non-economic damages in a wrongful death claim: the multiplier method and the per diem method. The multiplier method takes the total economic damages, such as medical bills and lost income, and multiplies that figure by a number generally ranging from 1.5 to 5.

Depending on the severity of the harm and the strength of the supporting evidence, to account for pain, suffering, and loss of companionship. The per diem method instead assigns a specific dollar value to each day affected by the loss and multiplies that daily rate across the relevant time period. Both approaches are starting points for negotiation rather than fixed formulas, and the right approach often depends on the unique circumstances of the family and the case.

In addition to the multiplier and per diem methods, the overall value of a wrongful death claim is shaped by several supporting factors that attorneys and insurers weigh together rather than in isolation.

The decedent’s age, health, and life expectancy at the time of his passing all factor into projections of lost future financial support and companionship, particularly in cases involving an older victim where these calculations require careful, individualized analysis rather than generic assumptions.

The number of surviving heirs, the closeness of family relationships, and the extent to which family members depended on the decedent for care, guidance, or income can also influence the final valuation. Because every family’s circumstances are different, a fair settlement figure is rarely a simple calculation and often benefits from an attorney’s experience negotiating similar cases to help ensure the amount offered truly reflects the family’s loss.

Our Commitment: No Fees Unless We Win Your Case

“Our hearts go out to this family and to anyone in our community who has lost a loved one this way. When a pedestrian accident takes a family member so suddenly, it’s natural to feel like there’s nothing left to do but grieve. But if you or someone you love has been hurt in a similar crash, please don’t assume you have no options until you’ve spoken with someone who can actually look into it. Fault isn’t always as clear-cut as it first appears, and there may be details about the intersection, the driver, or the circumstances that only come to light on closer inspection. Reach out to us for a free consultation. We’ll walk through what happened with you, answer your questions honestly, and help you understand what steps make sense for your family, all at no cost unless we recover for you.” – Andy Gillin, GJEL Accident Attorneys

Losing a loved one in a pedestrian accident brings a wave of grief, confusion, and unanswered questions. At GJEL Accident Attorneys, we have spent more than 40 years helping California families pursue justice and financial recovery after devastating accidents, recovering more than $950 million for our clients.

If your family has been affected by this crash or a similar accident, we encourage you to reach out for a free, no-obligation consultation. We work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless we recover compensation on your behalf. Call us today at 1-855-508-9565 or visit our San Jose office to learn more about how we can help.

Local Resources for Chico Families

Families affected by this crash, or anyone seeking more information about pedestrian safety and accident reporting in the Chico area, may find the following agencies helpful:

The Chico Police Department oversees the investigation into this collision and can be reached through its official page at chicoca.gov/City-Services/Public-Safety/Police-Department, where residents can find records requests, non-emergency reporting options, and department contact information.

The department is located at 1460 Humboldt Road, Chico, CA 95928, and can be reached by phone at (530) 897-4900 for non-emergency matters or (530) 897-4910 for records requests. Those wishing to review local crime data or public safety statistics for the surrounding area can also visit the department’s Crime Mapping Portal at crimemap.chicoca.gov.

The California Highway Patrol’s Chico Area Office, which patrols state highways and unincorporated roadways throughout Butte County, can be reached through the agency’s statewide site at chp.ca.gov, with the Chico office page specifically listed under the Valley Division directory. The Chico office can be reached by phone at (530) 332-2800, or by calling 1-800-TELL-CHP for general non-emergency assistance, accident report requests, or safety program information.

The Butte County Sheriff-Coroner’s Office, which handles death investigations outside city jurisdictions and maintains the county’s coroner division, can be reached at buttecounty.net/1009/Coroner for coroner-related inquiries or at buttecounty.net/1397/Contact-BCSO for general sheriff’s office contact information. The Coroner’s Division can be reached directly at (530) 552-5400, and the main Sheriff’s Office line is (530) 552-5300.

Enloe Medical Center, the region’s only Level II Trauma Center and the hospital most likely to treat serious injury victims from crashes in the Chico area, can be reached through its official site at enloe.org. The hospital’s main campus is located at 1531 Esplanade, Chico, CA 95926, and can be reached by phone at (530) 332-7300.

Families needing guidance on funeral arrangements following a coroner’s release can also review the Butte County directory of local funeral homes available through the Coroner’s Office page above, which lists several Chico-area providers who regularly assist families during this difficult process.

Andy Gillin, Founding and Managing Partner, GJEL Accident Attorneys

About the author

Founding and Managing Partner, GJEL Accident Attorneys

Andy Gillin is the founding and managing partner of GJEL Accident Attorneys. He earned his bachelor's degree from UC Berkeley and his law degree from the University of Chicago, and he has represented seriously injured Californians since 1972. He is a member of the State Bar of California (license 45226) and holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale Hubbell, with recognition from Super Lawyers and Best Lawyers in America.